When it's Black Gun Owners, the police openly cite the Black Panthers as justification. Armed Black citizens, even when lawful and disciplined, are suddenly framed as an unacceptable threat used by Law Enforcement.
"The police will give a Black driver a gun, even if he does not have one at all. Black People die at the hands of the police on fake charges with or without firearms. A traffic stop is a fatal stop by racist white police in the system."
The Paper Trap is born!
The Modern Pattern for Police Officers today is that a traffic stop becomes a criminal stop. The First thing that the officer asks is if you have a Gun (not a firearm) in your possession, before they ask you for your driver's license, insurance or vehicle registration. The police will give a Black driver a gun, even if he does not have one at all. Black People die at the hands of the police on fake charges. They do damage to you if you survive the stop and have lawful firearms when you are arrested. THAT ARREST RECORD IS FOREVER, EVEN IF YOU ARE LEGAL.-khs
By SDC News One IFS NewsWriters
WEST SACRAMENTO CA [IFS] -- On April 20, 1967, a group of Black men and women stood calmly on the steps of the California State Capitol, rifles held safely at their sides, law books in their hands. They were members of the Black Panther Party, and they were doing something both legal and deliberate: openly carrying firearms while observing police conduct, exactly as California law then allowed.
Within months, that right would be erased.
The Mulford Act—rushed through the legislature and signed by Governor Ronald Reagan—banned the public carrying of loaded firearms. Its purpose was rarely obscured. Lawmakers openly cited the Panthers as justification. Armed Black citizens, even when lawful and disciplined, were suddenly framed as an unacceptable threat.
Historians now point to the Mulford Act as one of the clearest examples of gun regulation driven by racialized fear. Less often examined is its afterlife: how that fear continues to shape police encounters with armed Black civilians across the country today.
The Modern Pattern
In theory, gun laws are race-neutral. In practice, enforcement tells a more complicated story.
Across multiple states between 2022 and 2025, court records and civil rights filings show a recurring pattern: Black gun owners arrested or charged despite compliance with carry laws, licensing requirements, and disclosure rules. In many cases, charges were later dismissed. The legal system quietly corrected itself—after lives were disrupted.
In Ohio (2023), a licensed Black concealed-carry holder was arrested during a traffic stop after voluntarily disclosing his firearm, as required by state law at the time. Dashcam footage later showed no threatening behavior. Charges were dropped. The arrest record remained.
In Georgia (2024), a Black homeowner legally carrying on his own property was detained at gunpoint after a neighbor reported a “suspicious armed man.” Police later acknowledged no law had been broken. No charges were filed. No apology was issued.
In Illinois (2025), a Black delivery driver with a valid Firearm Owner’s Identification (FOID) card was charged with unlawful possession after an officer claimed “confusion” about transport rules. Prosecutors dismissed the case weeks later, citing compliance with the statute.
None of these cases made national headlines. None ended in convictions. All carried consequences.
https://thegrio.com/2020/07/28/black-gun-ownership-rises-after-pandemic-protests/
Discretion, Not Statute
Legal scholars emphasize that modern gun enforcement often turns not on what the law says, but on how officers interpret “risk.”
Terms such as reasonable suspicion, officer safety, and furtive movement appear repeatedly in arrest reports. These standards give police wide latitude—and courts routinely defer to officers’ stated perceptions of danger.
That discretion, critics argue, is not applied evenly.
“An armed white civilian is often presumed lawful until proven otherwise,” said one civil rights attorney who has represented gun owners in multiple states. “An armed Black civilian is often treated as a problem to be controlled first and sorted out later.”
This dynamic is not accidental. American policing developed alongside laws designed to restrict Black movement, Black assembly, and Black self-defense. The Mulford Act did not invent that history—it codified it for a modern era.
What ‘Following the Law’ Looks Like in Reality
For Black gun owners, legal compliance does not always function as protection. Instead, it becomes a minimum threshold—one that still may not prevent detention or arrest.
Firearms instructors and attorneys who work with Black gun owners increasingly frame their guidance around realism rather than reassurance.
Know the law, they advise—but also know how the law has been enforced.
That distinction matters.
SIDEBAR: KNOW YOUR RIGHTS
(Print Reference Guide)
If You Are a Lawful Gun Owner:
-
Know your state’s carry and transport rulesOpen carry, concealed carry, vehicle transport, and disclosure requirements vary widely and change frequently.
-
Disclosure rules matterSome states require immediate disclosure to police; others prohibit it unless asked. Saying too much—or too little—can escalate encounters.
-
You are not required to consent to searchesYou may clearly state: “I do not consent to any searches.”
-
You have the right to remain silentYou may provide identification and required disclosures, then state: “I choose to remain silent and would like an attorney.”
-
Documentation helps later, not always immediatelyDashcams, body cams, and permits may not prevent arrest—but they often determine outcomes in court.
-
Have legal support identified in advanceKnow which attorneys handle firearms and civil rights cases in your area.
Rights, Unevenly Applied
The Second Amendment promises a right. The Fourteenth promises equal protection. Yet history shows that American gun law has often expanded and contracted along racial lines.
The Mulford Act was not an anomaly. It was a warning—one that echoes whenever lawful behavior becomes suspicious because of who is exercising it.
That gap—between written law and lived reality—is where fear persists, arrests occur, and trust erodes.
Understanding that gap is not cynicism. It is survival knowledge.
https://10f1529d27154a9ca812f4ce87b55550.elf.site
- 30 -
No comments:
Post a Comment