House Democrats float a constitutional amendment allowing Congress to override a presidential pardon

 IFS News Staff Writers Commentary

House Democrats float a constitutional amendment allowing Congress to override a presidential pardon

By IFS News Staff Writers

WASHINGTON [IFS] -- The presidential pardon power is one of the broadest authorities in the Constitution. It’s in Article II, and it’s sweeping by design: the president can grant pardons for federal crimes, with almost no limits beyond impeachment cases. The Founders built it that way partly to allow mercy, partly to calm political unrest, and partly to give the executive flexibility in extraordinary situations.

But here’s the rub: they did not imagine a world of hyper-partisan media ecosystems, loyalty tests, and presidents dangling pardons in plain sight for allies, donors, or co-conspirators.

So when House Democrats float a constitutional amendment allowing Congress to override a presidential pardon, it’s not just about Donald Trump. It’s about whether the current structure still makes sense in a political environment where the guardrails depend more on norms than on law.

Let’s be clear about something important: amending the Constitution is extremely difficult. It requires two-thirds of both chambers of Congress and ratification by three-fourths of the states. In today’s polarized climate, that’s Mount Everest in flip-flops. So practically speaking, this proposal is more about drawing a line in the sand than about imminent structural change.

But symbolically? It’s significant.

Critics argue that the pardon power has been weaponized — used not for justice, not for mercy, but for protection. When presidents pardon political allies, people who refused to cooperate with investigations, or figures tied to their own legal exposure, it raises a simple question: is this mercy, or is this insulation?

Defenders of the current system warn that letting Congress override pardons risks politicizing justice even further. Imagine a narrow majority undoing pardons every time the White House changes hands. That could turn clemency into just another partisan football.

So what’s really happening here?

Democrats appear to be signaling that the era of assuming “norms will save us” is over. For years, much of the constitutional system relied on restraint — the idea that presidents wouldn’t push every boundary simply because they could. Once that restraint erodes, the conversation shifts from trust to structural reform.

Whether you see this as “backbone” or as escalation probably depends on where you sit politically. But the larger story isn’t about party lines — it’s about institutional stress. When one branch appears to overreach, the other branches look for ways to reassert balance.

And that’s the tension at the heart of this moment:

Is the Constitution being tested… or is it being reshaped?

Either way, when lawmakers start talking about amending core executive powers, it’s a sign that confidence in self-policing norms has cracked. That’s not a small thing.

-30-